Sit-lie enforcement has officially been suspended
June 26, 2009 · 10 Comments
Categories: Street Roots
Tagged: sit-lie, Street Roots
Categories: Street Roots
Tagged: sit-lie, Street Roots
| 10 sources and 100 W… on Immigrant workers face extreme… | |
| Janelle on Editorial: Region must work fo… | |
| camper trailers on Camping ordinance being c… | |
| bee on Addict’s Almanac, Part… | |
| Dennis Murphy on “We’re not crazy… |
Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Cutline by Chris Pearson.

10 responses so far ↓
rocketpoetry // June 26, 2009 at 4:03 pm
What’s not noted in the police bureau’s letter is that the act must either be with intent or reckless. Which could make for some interesting interpretations by police (and security guards who are basically hired witnesses).
Here’s the Oregon statute that the police are now relying on:
166.025¹ Disorderly conduct in the second degree
(1) A person commits the crime of disorderly conduct in the second degree if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, the person:
(a) Engages in fighting or in violent, tumultuous or threatening behavior;
(b) Makes unreasonable noise;
(c) Disturbs any lawful assembly of persons without lawful authority;
(d) Obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic on a public way;
(e) Congregates with other persons in a public place and refuses to comply with a lawful order of the police to disperse;
(f) Initiates or circulates a report, knowing it to be false, concerning an alleged or impending fire, explosion, crime, catastrophe or other emergency; or
(g) Creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which the person is not licensed or privileged to do.
(2) Disorderly conduct in the second degree is a Class B misdemeanor.
Joanne
Patrick // June 26, 2009 at 4:56 pm
ok, I am reading that, exactly where does it say in Disorderly Conduct “Blocking Sidewalk”?
thanks
Patrick
Patrick // June 26, 2009 at 4:57 pm
ooops, should read it all the way thru slowly first… (d) Obstructs vehicular or pedestrian traffic on a public way;
Joanne Zuhl // June 26, 2009 at 6:39 pm
I’m particularly curious about the interpretation of “obstruct.” Is having to walk a step to the right a minor hinderance, or a Class B misdemeaner? Still leaves a lot up to police interpretation, which measures up against the realities of the streets, oh, and civil rights.
J Renaud // June 26, 2009 at 7:39 pm
The first paragraph of Sizer’s order is false. In his written opinion Bushong did not state persons who get in the way of pedestrian traffic “should be prosecuted under the disorderly conduct statute,” etc.
It’s a peculiar misuse of the judge’s opinion, and, again, reveals disappointing thinking on the part of the chief.
Torridjoe // June 27, 2009 at 9:13 am
Way to miss the point entirely, Rosie. The point is not to shoehorn some existing law into PBA’s
desire for clear sidewalks–it’s to begin recognizing that there is no legal justification for attempting to “move along” those with nowhere else to go. It’d be the same thing as a memo in the wake
of the anti-camping repeal, saying to use “defaulting the inkeeper” statues for failure to pay city lodging tax.
Boooo.
Torridjoe // June 27, 2009 at 9:14 am
Statutes, not statues…!
Kelly // July 9, 2009 at 10:40 am
Has anyone ever tried to bring charges against restaurants that take up the whole sidewalk with their tables and waiters? THAT is obstruction!
July 9 Newsletter « Oregon Opportunity Network // July 9, 2009 at 1:26 pm
[...] Click here to see a letter from the Portland Police stating that because a Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge ruled that Sit/Lie unconstitutionally exceeds the city’s authority, as it conflicts with and is preempted by state law, Portland police will stop enforcing it. [...]
What does the arrest of a Harvard Professor and peoeple on the streets in Portland have in common? Disorderly conduct. « For those who can’t afford free speech // July 25, 2009 at 11:45 am
[...] Portland, the police bureau are now using disorderly conduct in replace of the sit-lie law. The City of Portland is currently mulling over what a recent verdict by a judge ruling the sit-lie [...]