This note landed in my e-mail yesterday from a reader.
“It has come to my attention that some of your vendors are alcoholics and drug addicts. If this is true, I’m sorry to hear that. I was under the impression that buying your paper you were helping them. You maybe helping a few but not all and for that reason I will not buy your paper. You really should let the public know about the people that sell your papers and the problems they have. The money they make is going to there addiction and not helping them.”
Having an honest and open discussion about alcoholism and drug addiction is always a hard discussion, specifically in the context of homelessness. It’s even harder when an organization creates an alternative economic engine for people living on the streets, like a street newspaper.
Selling Street Roots is hard. There’s no question that the individual sleeping under a bridge tonight or in a cheap motel, after selling Street Roots all day, has put in a hard day’s work. There’s a lot of ways to make money on the streets, and selling Street Roots is an honest one.
Why do people experiencing homelessness and poverty ask for your dollar, specifically Street Roots vendors? The answers are as colorful as the people that walk through our door. The short answer is survival, but there’s more.
Some have been slammed by circumstance, the recession or from an unforgiving health care system. Some of the new faces of homelessness have been baffled at the idea of having to sell a street newspaper.
One vendor, possibly in his 50s, recently told me he was terrified to sell Street Roots because of the humiliation it would bring.
He had grown up in Portland and worked most of his adult life here. “What if I see people I use to work with or old high-school friends? It will kill me on the inside if I see these people,” he told me with a cringe. I had no logical answer for the man.
One vendor has been on the streets since he was 14 years old. He’s now in his 20s. Last month a Portland Police officer came to Street Roots to talk to me about him.
The police officer told me the vendor had become a nuisance downtown and had apparently said something smarmy to a Precinct Commander while trying to sell him a paper. We agreed that the vendor was out of line and that Street Roots would talk to him and let him know that’s not OK. It’s about respect.
What both the officer and I agreed on is that Street Roots shouldn’t give up on him. He could still go either way. Would it be a life of hard knocks, or will this young man go on to chase his dreams someday? Time will tell.
Everyone has a different story. Some have been abused both physically and sexually and their adult life has been spent lost at sea – trying to capture some form of dignity they lost as a youth.
One vendor in his 20s has just come back from two tours in Afghanistan and is sleeping on the streets. You can see in his eyes that he’s dealing with things I can either capture or describe.
My point is, nothing is black or white on the streets; it’s just different shades of grey. So when we talk about addiction and alcoholism, we have to talk about the atmosphere surrounding people’s lives.
Are some vendors using or drinking? Yes. Are there reasons that Street Roots or Portlanders should judge this kind of behavior? Depends. Should we seek to get people the help they need? Absolutely.
Street Roots is not a direct service. We believe in helping people help themselves – both through selling the newspaper and socialization (relationships) and by providing individuals with the resources and knowledge that exist for people. (www.rosecityresource.org)
For some, Street Roots doesn’t work. It takes dedication and very hard work to day in and day out be at a specific location to sell the newspaper. We don’t allow people to be aggressive and when they are, we work with vendors, business owners and readers to correct the problem.
We ask the vendors to be kind and courteous and treat people like they expect to be treated. We also ask that vendors do not use or drink while selling Street Roots. But we do not attempt to police their behavior once they are done selling the newspaper.
Should we? It’s always been a tough question. The answer we’ve always landed on is no, we shouldn’t punish a minority of vendors who may use some money made from the sales of Street Roots for drugs or booze. Here’s why:
If a Street Roots vendor chooses to have a beer or smoke a joint after work, for either leisurely or medicinal purposes and is not on the streets because of their addiction, how does that make him or her any different than the average Portlander?
Street Roots is not a charity, but instead a method of work to earn an income. Why is a homeless person that works held to higher standards? We believe it’s because people don’t have a home. By default, drinking beer or wine is illegal. Does that make someone not worthy of working? We don’t think so.
Street Roots vendors and people experiencing homelessness deal with the realities of the streets every day of their lives. Often times that means being exposed to hard drugs like crack cocaine or heroin. It’s not hard to find.
At Street Roots, we call it living on both sides of the gun. On one side are the drug dealers and the drugs themselves, and on the other side are inhumane laws targeting homeless folks.
We tend to believe that if a vendor is using after selling Street Roots, it’s better than the alternative. They are not stealing from anyone to get their fix and they don’t have to hustle anything other than paper to be on the up and up.
It may seem twisted, but we would rather be able to engage a vendor who is using on a day-to-day basis than have that person be shoplifting or breaking into somebody’s car to get money for a fix. (Such stories were highlighted in Tye Doudy’s award winning column called Addict’s Almanac that ran in Street Roots in 2008.)
The person dealing with a hardcore addiction has the opportunity to be influenced by other vendors and staff in a positive way, while having to maintain the discipline of selling the newspaper.
We also encourage people to deal with their feelings and emotions through expressing themselves through art, poetry and opinion pieces in the paper. We also engage folks on the resources that do exist for help. It’s more or less a harm reduction approach.
Do we always get it right? No. One Street Roots vendor and dear friend died of a heroin overdose in our doorway. Did we enable that person or not do enough? Should we have not allowed him to sell papers? It weighs on our minds.
One the flipside, dozens of vendors have gone from using to getting clean and sober while with the newspaper and with the help of our friends in the region.
What we do know is that the vast majority of our vendors use the money made from selling Street Roots to better their lives.
A hand full of vendors with either criminal and/or evictions records pool their money every week for hotel rooms. Some use the money to buy organic food they can’t find at many services. Some buy bike trailers and adequate camping gear. Others use the money to supplement medical costs or to rent a studio apartment.
So, are we honest with the public at Street Roots about drugs and alcohol? We believe so.
For every person dealing with an addiction on the streets it’s a different road. For some people it takes a day to climb up the mountain, for others a week or month or possibly even a lifetime.
At the end of the day, without an adequate health care system, a supportive social network and ultimately a will to live, it’s all for naught. Street Roots does its best and can never in good faith turn our backs on those who may be walking a thin red line.
It’s a conversation that must continue.
By Israel Bayer, Executive Director
Photo by Sarah Smith: Brent Snyder selling the newspaper. Brent has been clean and sober for more than 10 years and has helped mentor other vendors off the streets.
(In the next paper look for vendor responses to the letter and please take the time to check a recent audio piece done by Steve Greenberg to learn more about Street Roots.)

20 responses so far ↓
itsjustme // June 18, 2009 at 8:55 pm
i’m sorry to hear of this. I am indoors now, working a full time job — in the technical field. But, when I was outside, getting a bit of alcohol or maybe even doing a ligna was one very effective solution to enduring the cold. can this country ever warm up to the idea of the empowerment model?
DC MATTHEWS // June 18, 2009 at 9:09 pm
Well ,if that attitude continues maybe that guy will be stealing to survive.
Please don’t let people believe most homeless are addicts, and even many of the substance abusers only became that way after they gave up on getting out -or should i say in.
I am female multi disabled and not a substance abuser ( unless you count coffee cigs and carnitas) i was homeless almost 9 years. We need help, not judging, please.
Feel free to forward this to your reader.
Stoop // June 18, 2009 at 10:56 pm
Thanks for this article Izzy. We must not turn our backs to those who have at one time brightened our day when we are newly exposed to the dark angles and hard realities of real life. If we do so, we are basically saying by example that it’s OK for someone to do the same to us when we are in our darkest hour. I don’t think this is what we want. It is in these times–when the depths of pain and suffering is revealed–that we must seek and share the deeper love and compassion that only a greater supportive community can accomplish together. Street Roots has been such a community and I am proud and honored to call you all friends.
rocketpoetry // June 19, 2009 at 12:22 am
We honored as well Stoop.
Would love to hear more insights so we can share with readers.
Israel
Tye Doudy // June 21, 2009 at 12:51 am
Well written and I think you got to the point in a frank way that most people will grasp. Unfortunately the people who need to “get it” the most, are the least likely to do so.
rocketpoetry // June 21, 2009 at 8:52 am
Unfortunately, I think you’re right Tye. Still, needed to be said…
Israel
Janelle // June 21, 2009 at 9:26 am
I’m a 30 year old Street Roots vendor who has been clean & sober for over 6 ½ years and I also have past experiences with homelessness. The issue about vendors being “alcoholic/drug addicts” is class discrimination. All people from various social classes experience alcohol/drug addiction, even doctors who practice medicine. Should the doctor’s not work? They have access to pretty expensive alcohol/drugs yet the US society doesn’t tend to focus on the higher classes alcohol/drug addictions that often (ABC News, http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PainManagement/story?id=6232694&page=1, “Urine drug tests for doctors?,” Retrieved June 21, 2009). People who are homeless or poverty stricken are stereotyped and marginalized (National Coalition for the Homeless, http://www.citymayors.com/society/homeless_usa2.html, “Report accuses US cities of criminalizing the homeless,” Retrieved June 21, 2009). I completed my Bachelor of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies at Marylhurst University with grants, scholarships, and student loans in 2008 (Marylhurst University, http://www.marylhurst.edu/aboutmarylhurst/pressrelease20080604.php, “Marylhurst University announces 2008 degree candidates,” Retrieved June 21, 2009). I grew up in a single-parent family and have been a Street Roots vendor since January 16, 2009. Please do not discriminate towards any social class, especially the homeless and poverty stricken; Street Roots does a good thing by employing the marginalized.
Writing and junk and stuff… « Rocket Poetry // June 29, 2009 at 6:20 pm
[...] a piece on addiction that has drummed up lots of interest. And still [...]
Michael De Bee // July 1, 2009 at 8:11 am
Like Janelle, I am also a homeless vendor of Street Roots, but unlike her I have never used drugs or alcohol.Despite this abstinence (which most homeless and/or vendors manage) I am:
1 constantly under suspicion of intoxication by anyone who perceives I am homeless
2 unable to make use of any day access centers, foodlines, public restrooms or benches, because
drug addicts and drunks have monopolized them and threatenthe homeless with death and dismemberment if we try to use them.
3 fear for my safety when I come to the Street Roots office for papers or a meeting because the very few addicts and drunks there have threatened my life at one time or another
I ask readers to support the homeless against our most imminent danger and millstone–the addicts and drunks who’ve been in the streets long before us.
Janelle // July 1, 2009 at 2:57 pm
Hi Michael,
I am not homeless right now, I have past experiences of homelessness.
Janelle
Dave R. // July 3, 2009 at 9:09 pm
What is this about the firing of Street Roots vendor Mike DeBerg over this issue of chronic drug offenders selling the paper?
Why the heavy hand? If there are CHRONIC addicts among the vendors, shouldn’t they be guided into treatment programs — in a concerned, competent manner?
Won’t the acquiescence of Street Roots’ management – through inaction or mere transfer of chronic offenders – indeed stigmatize the paper and its (vast majority sober) vendor crew? I think poor Mike is right – it’s a bad policy. And he should not dismissed for insisting so.
rocketpoetry // July 4, 2009 at 6:31 am
Dave,
We’re not commenting on this.
We can say though, no vendor has ever been let go for expressing their opinions on a subject matter.
- Israel Bayer
Joy // July 4, 2009 at 12:44 pm
I have been buying Street Roots from Mike De Bee for years, and have found each transaction pleasant. Pointing out articles of interest and following up on previous conversations, he is an asset to your organization. So, I am curious about the ongoing controversy. Please let us know what is going on. It seems strange to continue to support vendors who, by their behavior, discourage people from buying your paper, while letting go one who actively encourages the sale and actual reading of the paper.
Chris and Melanie // July 6, 2009 at 9:00 am
We have been hearin about this controversy, and it is true that there are a few hard core users of crack and H who are still selling the paper. We think it’s a weird deal that one Streetroots dude only got TRANSFERED and is still selling Streetroots after Fred Meyers banned him for selling bad H to an employee of theirs.
To just put him on a different corner with a Street Roots badge. We use H once in awhile, but this sounds dangerous even to us. Your clean vendors are your “canaries in the mine shaft.” Maybe you should poll them anonymusly or whatev. We’re don’t care about the recreational uZers here — we have all f’d up like that. We’re talking about a few pushy dudes with hard core needs – who somehow still get to sell Streetroots.
If you really cared about them guys at Streetroots, you’d think twice about giving them cash. We do. Ain’t right – ya’ll R just enabling. And it just puts your average customer on the spot – facing some glassy-eyed vendor – makes her unsure about givin up her dollar.
Staci Schoff // July 6, 2009 at 12:05 pm
As a business owner and friend to the Street Roots vendors in my neighborhood, I want to say that I hope it is true that Mike DeBee’s disappearance is not related to his disagreement with you about the handling and treatment of chronic drug users within your organization. In light of all the good that you do for the community, I would hope that you are holding yourself to the highest standards when dealing with people over whom you have a degree of power and that you are careful to respect the autonomy and inherent dignity of your vendors even when it is unpleasant or inconvenient. My experiences with Mike DeBee have always been pleasant, informative and helpful — it would be tragic for you to lose him in favor of defending a few people who are only motivated to feed an addiction. It is your vendors who stand on the street all day and are judged harshly by the majority of the people with whom they come in contact — they are asking you to help them in their struggle to be seen as human beings worthy of the same respect accorded human beings who can afford to buy houses. As a supporter of your paper, I hope that you will take their needs and feelings to heart.
rocketpoetry // July 6, 2009 at 1:03 pm
Hi everyone,
We very much appreciate everyone’s perspective on the issues of addiction, homelessness and specifically, Street Roots.
Concerning, our vendors, we don’t openly discuss personnel matters with the organization to protect the privacy of the vendors.
We can say though, that no one has ever been asked to leave SRs because of the opinions expressed, unless it was against office and vendor policies that include violence, threats of violence, racism, sexism or classism, including personal attacks.
- Israel Bayer
Kreeg // July 6, 2009 at 2:46 pm
I have volunteered and been a donor at Street Roots for two years and have always found Israel Bayer and staff to be fair and impartial in their dealings with all vendors. Not always an easy challenge to be sure. I believe that Israel’s addiction piece was thoughtful and well written in response to a customer concern. I feel badly that one or two vendors had a very different opinion and response. I tend to discuss articles in the office with staff and vendors and, with only one exception, everyone I have spoken with in the Street Roots office support Israel’s point of view. Addiction is a problem in almost every company nation wide and I’m proud that Street Roots has taken a lead in discussing it openly.
Dave R. // July 7, 2009 at 9:08 am
Having talked more with Street Roots vendor Mike De Bee, it is clear that there is a bit of a history of disagreements between him and the Newspaper’s Director. As for the issue of chronic offenders among the vendors, again it should be obvious to customers that they are the tiny minority.
I am in agreement with Israel and Mike that the great majority of vendors are clean and sober. We should be buying their newspapers!
I agree with Israel that there should NOT be a ‘zero tolerance’ approach, nor any drug screening for vendors who function well while selling the paper and do not break the law while vending. I agree with Mike that the worst of offenders (just a few – seen breaking the law while on duty several times) should be sent to treatment and separated from Street Roots if they can’t get straight.
The misery of living without shelter often leads to “self-medication” – i.e., drug and alcohol abuse. Street Roots is different than other companies in that its very purpose is to help the homeless to have some income. So of course there are going to be ongoing drug problems among some of the vendors.
Street Roots is up against some terrible numbers here. Effectively steering some of the the more dysfunctional of the offending vendors toward treatment is made much more difficult by the lack of effective programs – and the lack of available housing/shelter. Two year waiting lists for housing, and very limited shelter capacity are big factors in the recovery efforts of many people on the streets who really do want to quit.
The Journal of American Medicine Association (JAMA, January 14, 2009) recently proved again that providing housing (and work) for addicted homeless people does significantly increase the chances of their recovery. We have too little housing and shelters in this town! Jobs too, obviously. Given the fast growing numbers of newly homeless, this lack of transitional shelter space and housing is making a whole lot of bad problems much worse.
Melissa // July 14, 2009 at 7:50 pm
While downtown today I noticed a young man very aggressively selling SR, and I was really taken aback. I’ve been a reader for over ten years, and this is the first time I’ve seen a vendor behave obnoxiously. To be honest, his behavior was so different from all the vendors I’ve encountered over the years that, regretfully, I was a little suspicious. I will continue to buy the paper from vendors that I know, but I worry that vendors who are not clean and sober, and are still allowed to represent the paper to the public, will quite literally chase any potential new readers away.
Street Roots Vendor Returns To Selling The Paper After Protesting Director's Column on Addiction, Homelessness | Willamette Week | Wednesday, July 29th, 2009 // July 29, 2009 at 8:35 am
[...] Portland neighborhood — three weeks after a suspension that followed his objections to a column written last month by Bayer. DeBee felt Bayer made all vendors look like addicts when Bayer wrote “we shouldn’t punish a [...]